Seyed Masoud Hosseini · Overview · Study log · Weekly summaries · Ideas · Search · Transcript · RSS feed

Justice · Lecture 14 of 19 · 1:15

Bioethics: Testing Utilitarianism

Justice with Michael Sandel - CCCB: Bioethics: Testing utilitarianism on YouTube

Study guide

What this lecture covers

This very short excerpt, animated for the Spanish television program Soy Camara, replays one of Sandel's classic thought experiments from his Harvard lectures: the transplant surgeon case. Sandel asks the audience to imagine being a surgeon with five patients who will die without an organ transplant each, and a healthy visitor napping in the next room whose organs could save all five. He asks who would be willing to take the organs from the one healthy person to save the five.

Key ideas

  • The transplant surgeon case: a thought experiment that mirrors the classic trolley problem, testing whether it's acceptable to sacrifice one healthy, unwilling person to save five others.
  • Testing utilitarianism: the case is designed to show that maximizing the number of lives saved, a purely utilitarian calculation, can conflict sharply with most people's moral intuitions about individual rights.
  • Numbers aren't everything: the excerpt's point, echoed in its framing, is that morality can't always be reduced to counting outcomes.

Before you watch

  • This excerpt assumes no prior context; it works as a quick illustration of the limits of utilitarian reasoning that recurs throughout the Justice course's early lectures on Bentham and Mill.

Check your understanding

  1. What choice does the transplant surgeon thought experiment ask you to make?
  2. Why does this case pose a problem for a purely utilitarian approach to ethics?

Vocabulary

thought experiment (noun)
An imagined scenario used to test an idea or theory.
The transplant surgeon case is a classic thought experiment.
transplant (noun)
A surgical procedure moving an organ from one body to another.
Each patient needs an organ transplant to survive.
sacrifice (verb)
To give up or harm one thing for the sake of another.
The case asks whether it's right to sacrifice one person to save five.
unwilling (adjective)
Not wanting to do something, without consent.
The healthy visitor is unwilling to give up his organs.
utilitarian (adjective)
Relating to the theory that the right action produces the greatest total good.
A utilitarian calculation says saving five lives outweighs one.
intuition (noun)
An immediate feeling or belief that something is right or wrong, without conscious reasoning.
Most people's moral intuitions reject the transplant surgeon's choice.
reduce (to) (verb)
To simplify something to a smaller or more basic form.
Morality can't always be reduced to counting outcomes.
excerpt (noun)
A short part taken from a longer piece of writing, video, or speech.
This is a short excerpt from a longer lecture.
animated (adjective)
Made using drawings or computer graphics that appear to move, rather than filmed live.
The clip is an animated version of the classic case.
mirror (verb) (verb)
To closely resemble or reflect something else.
The transplant case mirrors the earlier trolley problem.
conflict with (phrasal verb)
To be in disagreement or tension with something.
The utilitarian answer can conflict with common moral intuitions.
framing (noun)
The way a topic or question is presented, which shapes how people think about it.
The framing of the question affects how people respond.
visitor (noun)
A person who is staying somewhere temporarily.
A healthy visitor is napping in the next room.
willing (adjective)
Ready and happy to do something.
The surgeon asks who would be willing to take the organs.
calculation (noun)
A careful working out of a result, often using numbers or logic.
The moral calculation weighs one life against five.
outcome (noun)
The result or effect of an action or event.
Utilitarianism judges actions by their outcome.
recur (verb)
To happen again, especially repeatedly over time.
This thought experiment recurs throughout the course.
illustration (noun)
An example that helps explain or clarify an idea.
The case works as a quick illustration of a moral problem.
napping (verb)
Sleeping for a short period, especially during the day.
The healthy visitor is napping in the next room.
audience (noun)
The group of people watching or listening to something.
Sandel asks the audience who would take the organs.

From the YouTube description

To register for the 2015 course, visit https://www.edx.org/course/justice-harvardx-er22-1x-0.

Is it always right to sacrifice one life to save five? Is morality always about numbers? An excerpt of Sandel's Harvard Justice lecture, with animation added by Soy Camara (Centre of Contemporary Culture of Barcelona).

← Bioethics: Designer Children · BBC: Fair Pay? →